Every March, IBM invites customers and analysts to its annual Pulse user conference. This year, Pulse was all about the more efficient delivery of IT services, a concept that is usually referred to as “cloud”. Since cloud has developed into a term that, due to its overuse, is often frowned upon, to say the least, it was great to see IBM try hard to demystify this elusive concept, backing it up with numerous case studies and customer testimonials. The fact that many of these case studies were not as polished as you so often see during this type of show, made the experience actually better. It became clear that these were real customers, implementing “cloud” to solve very specific corporate problems and while doing this, running into very specific IT problems. This is something that just happens when breaking new ground and it speaks for IBM’s self confidence to not present only squeaky clean projects at its show.
IBM Pulse 2012: Visibility – Control – Automation
By Torsten Volk on Mar 28, 2012 1:35:00 PM
User Experience Management Panel in Boston
By Dennis Drogseth on Mar 21, 2012 1:27:25 PM
User Experience Management (UEM) continues to capture interest in the marketplace. And yet it remains somewhat elusive. So, what is User Experience Management really? It’s gone by many other names in the past, such as Quality of Experience (QoE), and has other incarnations in the present such as Real User Management (RUM). Older, typically network-centric [...]
The Many Dimensions of User Experience Management (UEM)
By Dennis Drogseth on Mar 13, 2012 11:49:26 AM
See Dennis’ recent article on User Experience Management (UEM), posted at APM Digest, here: http://www.apmdigest.com/the-many-dimensions-of-user-experience-management-uem
(Guest Blog @ Parallels) How to Bring the Cloud to the SMB Marketplace
By Torsten Volk on Feb 13, 2012 10:58:56 AM
See Torsten’s guest blog at Parallels.
The CMDB/CMS Market in Transition
By Dennis Drogseth on Feb 9, 2012 10:49:26 AM
On the one hand, many in the industry have begun todismiss the CMDB as well past its prime, at least in terms of industry hype and attention. For this rather significant population, the CMDB has evolved into a complex and demanding data store with tangible but difficult-to-justify benefits, with questionable relationships to cloud computing and [...]
Diskless VDI: Resolving the VDI Storage Cost Bottleneck
By Torsten Volk on Feb 8, 2012 1:19:16 PM
Why pay $1,500 per virtual desktop, if you can have a physical machine of the same performance-level at half the cost. While the functional and maintenance advantages of virtual desktop computing are evident, the per machine CAPEX often is the key stumbling block for this type of project. It is very hard to convince your CFO to write a check for more money per virtual machine than it would cost to acquire physical desktops.
Blurring the Lines Across Traditional Boundaries: Top IT & Data Management Trends of 2012
By Dennis Drogseth on Jan 27, 2012 11:37:00 AM
At the beginning of this month, EMA analysts were asked for their predictions about what 2012 might bring. Responses spanned management solutions across applications, systems, network, security, services, assets, desktops, and mobile devices, as well as business intelligence and content management. The results were surprisingly cohesive, and as a whole reflected core requirements in analytics, [...]
Workload Automation Trends and Predictions for 2012
By Torsten Volk on Jan 23, 2012 3:34:46 PM
IT as a Service is one of the hottest topics these days. In a nutshell, it entails the radical alignment of all IT disciplines around strategic business requirements. Instead of having to beg IT for resources and services, as many of us are accustomed to, we can now pick all the resources and services from an easy-to-use online catalog. Workload automation features are finally becoming part of this service catalog, allowing business users to trigger, monitor, and even repair essential job flows.
The Myth of the Single Vendor Unified Management Platform
By Steve Brasen on Jan 9, 2012 11:17:51 AM
For the past two decades or so, several leading IT management vendors have tried to convince us that organizations should invest in a single unified management platform for supporting all of IT management needs. Setting aside for the moment the fact that such an animal does not and cannot possibly exist (no vendor has the capital to develop every possible IT management product– I don’t care who they are), the value proposition of a single vendor uber-solution is flawed. Sure, it sounds great to have one centralized console for accessing all automated support functions, and being able to deal with one vendor and one product set may seem like it will simplify management processes, but in reality this is not likely to be the case. Primary deterrents to all-in-one solutions include:
Choosing a Client Lifecycle Management Solution
By Steve Brasen on Jan 9, 2012 11:16:50 AM
Desktop PCs and laptops are the backbone of business profitability. Yes, yes … I know … last week I raved about the rising mobile device revolution – but that transition is still a few years off. Today the PC desktop remains king in enabling enterprise workforce productivity, and, in fact, organizational success and ongoing profitability is tied at the hip to desktop and laptop performance in most modern enterprises. Unfortunately, management of these endpoints persists in being a nightmare to perform. Consider your own home PC environment – how much time do you spend on installations, patch updates, and performance improvements, not to mention repairs from system crashes, malware intrusion, and software incompatibilities. Now extend these challenges to hundreds or thousands or even millions of endpoints, and you get some sense of the daunting task facing IT managers.